|
Custom Diameter and Giant Diameter O-Rings and Seals Manufacturing Methods
Marco supplies fully molded O-Rings and other basic seals often without tooling fees for custom sizes less than 35” diameter.
When a very small quantity of custom sized seals are needed quickly, often spliced and vulcanized or bonded methods are most practical. Also, non-traditional molding methods are required to produce giant oversized seals with diameters over 35” diameter. We have summarized the various methods to help determine the best option for your application. Dimensional tolerances vary by size and manufacturing method. All of these methods are non-returnable so please contact us if additional details are required.
Method |
Continuous Molding |
Molded Joint |
Precision Vulcanization |
Standard Vulcanization |
Relative Cost |
$$$$$$ |
$$$$ |
$$$ |
$$ |
Tooling Cost |
Depends on CS |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Typical Lead Time |
5-12 Weeks |
2-8 Weeks |
1-21 Days |
1-21 Days |
|
Not Actual Example Images - Exaggerated Oversized Renderings |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Method |
Continuous Molding |
Molded Joint |
Precision Vulcanization |
Standard Vulcanization |
Advantages |
-Best option for high performance, dynamic, gas, pressure and vacuum applications over 35” Diameter
-Performance similar to fully molded
-Proprietary method yields consistent quality |
-No mold/tool cost
-option for prototyping and basic applications with > 15% compression-squeeze
-Performance can be similar to fully molded
|
-Best value for prototyping and basic applications
-Proprietary method yields consistent quality
-Angled joint increases bond surface area and strength |
-Rubber based adhesive
-Flexible compressible joint
-Angled or Straight joint depending on material and thickness
-Only for basic static, low pressure, short term applications |
Disadvantages |
-Highest cost due to time and scrap rate
-Longer lead times
-Best option for high performance, dynamic, gas and vacuum applications
|
-Inconsistent quality
-Occasional slight under-fill or over-fill at joint increases leak potential
-Parting line and flash can be misaligned and buffed at joint
-Multiple joints can be required
-Not recommended for vacuum or high pressure |
-Higher cost than standard vulc
-Lead times can be longer than standard vulc
-Potential for slight excess adhesive, misalignment and buffing at joint
-Not recommended for vacuum, high pressure or dynamic seals |
-Inconsistent quality
-Angled or Straight joint depends on material and thickness
-Potential excessive adhesive at joint
-Potential misalignment
-Only for basic static, low pressure, short term applications |
|
Continuous Molding |
|
Molded Joint 2 Potential slight under-fill at joint could lead to leaks in some applications 3 Parting line and flash can be misaligned at joint 4 Buffing at the joint can yield variable surface finish from the rest of the part |
|
Precision Spliced and Vulcanized 1 Potential for slight adhesive excess at joint (Exaggerated Renderings to describe potential issues) 2 Potential slight misalignment 3 Buffing at the joint can yield variable surface finish from the rest of the part |
|
1 Potential excessive adhesive at joint (Exaggerated Renderings to describe potential issues) 2 Potential misalignment 3 Buffing at the joint can yield variable surface finish from the rest of the part |
|
Copyright © 1997-2009 Billing & Mailing Address: Marco Rubber PO Box 1150 Seabrook, NH 03874 Shipping Address: Marco Rubber 35 Woodworkers Way, Seabrook, NH 03874 Sales Fax: 603-468-3490 | Accounting Fax: 603-468-3691 Main Phone: 603-468-3600 | Toll free: 800-775-6525 | E-mail Additional Offices: Providence RI, Philadelphia PA, and Los Angeles CA |
Markez® and Ohmerics® are registered trademarks of Marco Rubber
Viton® and Kalrez® are registered trademark of DuPont Performance Elastomers
Teflon® is a registered trademark of DuPont
Chomerics® CHO-SEAL® is a registered trademark of Parker Hannifin.
Chemraz® is a registered trademark of Green Tweed.
Quad-Ring® is a registered trademark of Minnesota Rubber.